|
ASTHMA
IS MISDIAGNOSED AND UNDERTREATED
IN THE ELDERLY
TUCSON-Asthma
diagnosis in patients older than age 65 years is only half as good as it should
be; 50% of elderly asthmatics have not been diagnosed, and only 30% of diagnosed
patients are treated with inhaled corticosteroids. That finding may help explain
why the asthma death rate in adults older than age 65 years is 10 times the death
rate in younger adults, said researcher Paul L. Enright, MD, and colleagues.1
As part of the Cardiovascular
Health Study (CHS) Research Group, Dr. Enright, who is research associate professor
at the University of Arizona, in Tucson, and colleagues used data from the CHS
to explore the effects of asthma in community-living elderly upon quality of life
(QOL), morbidity, and use of asthma medications. The CHS researchers had been
concerned about the impact of asthma on cardiovascular health and had included
appropriate measures in the study design. Prior studies of QOL in asthma included
only younger subjects.
ASTHMA AS COMORBIDITY
"I was asked to be the
'pulmonary expert' for the multicenter CHS even before it began, over 10 years
ago," Dr. Enright explained. "Asthma and smoking-related lung diseases
are common in elderly persons, so we prospectively decided to ask questions about
these lung diseases and perform spirometry for all study participants. After examining
the prevalence of asthma during the CHS baseline exam, we decided to ask more
extensive, standardized questions about asthma during the sixth follow-up exam
and to obtain an index of bronchial lability."
Therefore, CHS examinations
(conducted between May 1993 and June 1994) included not only comprehensive measures
of cardiovascular disease and risk factors, but also spirometry and standardized
questions about asthma symptoms and triggers. Patients were also asked to participate
in an optional study of peak flow lability, using home peak expiratory flow (PEF)
meters.
"We decided to ask the
participants to measure [PEF] at home for several days instead of performing a
methacholine challenge test or the response to inhaled bronchodilator, which requires
more clinic staff time," Dr. Enright said. "When told it was optional,
only 40% of the study participants agreed to measure their [PEF] at home for one
week." Elderly patients with asthma, he suggested, will be more likely than
CHS participants to try to use lung function testing at home to help manage their
asthma. Peak flow monitoring may be most useful for elderly persons with asthma
who have demonstrated high airway lability, are well-educated, are poor perceivers
of bronchoconstriction, and who want to participate in their asthma management
in order to minimize the need for prednisone.
The researchers found that
4% of all of the CHS participants reported definite asthma, an additional 4% reported
probable asthma, and 11% reported possible asthma (see Sidebar). To avoid the
possibility that reported symptoms might be due to smoking or to congestive heart
failure (CHF) rather than to asthma alone, smokers and those with CHF were excluded
from the final analysis, leaving 2,527 participants (out of a community sample
of 4,581 persons).
"Since the CHS participants
were a random sample of the Medicare eligible population from four US communities,
I believe our results are highly generalizable to ambulatory elderly patients
seen by primary care providers in the United States," Dr. Enright said.
MORE CASES THAN DIAGNOSES
The researchers slightly modified
the Global Initiative for Asthma (GIA) criterion for severe asthma, which is forced
expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of less than 60% of predicted.
Since that criterion produced "unreasonably high" proportions of "severe"
asthmatics among the elderly patients, Dr. Enright and colleagues used FEV1
of less than 50% of predicted as the cutoff for severe asthma, 50% to 69% for
moderate asthma, and 70% to 79% for mild asthma. The data showed many more cases
of probable or possible asthma than had been diagnosed; another crucial finding
was that a relatively high proportion of those patients had severe disease (Table
1).
| Table
1 |
| Disease
Severity in Elderly Patients |
| |
Asthma
status
(per patient's report) |
| Spirometry
results |
Definite |
Probable |
Possible |
Severe
asthma
(FEV1 < 50% predicted) |
21.70% |
16.10% |
10.20% |
Moderate
asthma
(FEV1 50%-69% predicted) |
35.90% |
10.80% |
13.10% |
Mild
asthma
(FEV1 70%-79% predicted) |
27.20% |
40.90% |
22.20% |
"About 10% of those with
possible asthma and 16% of those with probable asthma were categorized as having
'severe persistent asthma' although they did not have a diagnosis of asthma,"
Dr. Enright reported.
Asthma symptoms were triggered
or made worse by dust, smoke, or fumes; colds, sore throats, or flu; exercise
or exertion; contact with animals, plants, or pollens; or lying down flat or sleeping.
Two thirds of patients with probable or definite asthma reported dyspnea while
walking quickly, and 16% reported shortness of breath while walking on level ground
at their own pace.
The implications for QOL are
obvious and were supported by the QOL data. Patients with any level of asthma--even
very moderate--were more likely to rate their general health as fair or poor and
to report that their level of activity was less than in the previous year. About
half said that "everything was an effort" in the previous two weeks.
Asthma and poor QOL in turn affected overall well-being. These patients were twice
as likely to have symptoms of depression.
Patients with possible, probable,
or definite asthma were more likely than others to wake up in the middle of the
night with coughing, with chest tightness or pain, or with trouble breathing.
Not surprisingly, they were also twice as likely to report daytime sleepiness.
"The large number of
elderly persons who have asthma symptoms identified by this study--but who have
not received a diagnosis of asthma--is disturbing because they are experiencing
reduced QOL and considerable morbidity associated with their asthma, which may
be largely preventable," Dr. Enright noted. "If the diagnosis were made,
23% of those with possible asthma and 27% of those with probable asthma would
be categorized as having moderate or severe persistent asthma, for which daily
inhaled corticosteroid medications are indicated."
STEROID PHOBIA
Unfortunately, elderly asthmatics
who manage to get diagnosed are not usually receiving what is now standard therapy
(Table 2). Clinical guidelines recommend daily anti-inflammatory medications,
such as inhaled corticosteroids, plus rescue use of long-acting bronchodilators
for patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids
rarely cause side effects and minimize the need for chronic oral corticosteroids,
such as prednisone, which are associated with a high risk of side effects in the
elderly.
| Table
2 |
| Asthma
Treatment in the Elderly |
| |
Asthma
status
(per patient's report) |
| Reported
treatments |
Definite |
Probable |
Possible |
| Inhaled sympathomimetics |
40.2% |
6.5% |
0.4% |
| Inhaled steroids |
30.4% |
2.2% |
0.4% |
| Theophylline |
20.7% |
4.3% |
1.8% |
| Oral corticosteroids |
18.5% |
1.1% |
2.2% |
| Allergy shots
(ever) |
44.0% |
15.1% |
14.5% |
The CHS data showed that only
30% of those with definite asthma were taking inhaled corticosteroids, while 40%
were taking inhaled or oral sympathomimetics and 18.5% were taking oral corticosteroids.
Thirty-nine percent were not using any asthma medication, including 6 of the 20
patients with severe asthma. "It is worrisome that a relatively high proportion
(18%) of our elderly participants with definite asthma (regardless of their smoking
history) were taking oral corticosteroids," Dr. Enright commented.
Of further concern was the
finding that while only 39% of patients with definite asthma were on inhaled corticosteroids,
44% had received allergy shots. "I was personally surprised that most elderly
persons identified allergic factors exacerbating their asthma, and that many had
tried allergy shots (which are relatively ineffective), yet few are routinely
using inhaled corticosteroids, which are highly effective and low risk,"
Dr. Enright said. "Pulmonary physicians must act to reduce the steroid phobia
preventing many primary care providers and their patients with asthma from 'putting
out the fire' in their airways."
The key to improving the treatment
of asthma in the elderly is clearly to improve the rate of diagnosis. The CHS
researchers recommend the wider use of office spirometers to confirm the presence
of airway obstruction in patients with symptoms suggesting possible or probable
asthma, as well as a baseline FEV1 for monitoring lung function in
response to therapy. In the absence of office spirometry, they suggested home
peak flow lability measurements using a $20 mechanical peak flow meter.
The researchers even advised
that smokers who have asthma-like symptoms and airway obstruction should be treated
with a 2-week clinical trial of corticosteroids and bronchodilators. In fact,
about 10% of current or former smokers who are believed to have chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD) are actually "hidden asthmatics" and will respond
with a substantial increase in lung function.
"The findings of this
study should cause primary care providers to obtain spirometry testing to help
confirm their suspicions of asthma or COPD for elderly persons with respiratory
symptoms, regardless of their smoking status," Dr. Enright advised. "Treatment
for asthma in the elderly should be more aggressive and should follow current
clinical practice guidelines--which emphasize the routine use of inhaled corticosteroids--in
order to improve the quality of life of active senior citizens.
"I suspect that the vast
underdiagnosis of asthma in the elderly is due to common misperceptions that asthma
is primarily a disease of childhood, rarely starts for the first time in [the
elderly], and that episodes of shortness of breath in the elderly are inevitable,
or usually due to heart disease."
-Janis Kelly
Reference
1. Enright PL, McClelland RL, Newman AB, et al. Underdiagnosis and undertreatment
of asthma in the elderly. Chest. 1999;116:603-613.
|